A Supply Chain Approach To Beef Quality

Managing for beef quality isn’t an arbitrary end-product objective, panelists pointed out at a Cattlemen’s College session.
calendar icon 30 April 2011
clock icon 4 minute read

According to moderator Larry Corah, vice president of Certified Angu Beef LLC (CAB), it also means managing for more profit. “Managing for Quality: A supply chain approach” was presented at the National Cattle Industry Convention and Trade Show’s annual educational event Feb. 2 in Denver, Colo.

“Quality sells in this industry,” Corah said. “We talk a lot about pounds, but we also sell by dollar figures. A quality carcass puts more dollars in those pounds.” He led the cattle industry veterans in discussing every aspect of quality beef production including genetics, health, nutrition, ranch management and marketing.

A solid foundation is a good place to start differentiating value in beef cattle, said Aaron Arnett. “To maximize quality and dollars returned, we have to focus on genetics,” the Select Sires beef genetics division vice president said.

Carcass characteristics make an easy target for adding value because they are so highly heritable, Arnett added. “Does it take more groceries to create marbling? Absolutely not, if you start with animals that are able to express their genetic potential,” he said.

After genetics are selected, Pfizer Animal Health senior veterinarian Gerald Stokka said every health issue an animal encounters has the probability to affect its end performance. He shared the importance of the passive transfer of good health from a mother cow to her calf.

“Everything you do at the ranch is preparing that animal for the next stage,” he said, indicating performance in the feeding phase and after harvest. But it starts long before the calf is born. “The most intriguing area of research today is fetal programming,” he said. “We know that what a cow eats and feels [while pregnant] will affect the calf.”

Cattleman Ken Grecian, Palco, Kan., says a lot of the cow and subsequent calf performance in his herd is based in nutrition as well. “It doesn’t take much protein to make a lot of difference in how a cow performs,” he said. Nutrition affects body condition score (BCS), which impacts breeding rates, successful pregnancies and, yes, fetal programming.

“If a cow is not in condition, she’s a cull on our place,” Grecian said. That focus has made an impact on his herd and his bottom line. A little over a decade ago, he sold his first set of calves on a US Premium Beef (USPB) grid and learned a lot.

“Mostly, I learned that my calves weren’t near as good as I thought they were,” he shared with a chuckle. The top 61 per cent graded USDA Choice, leaving the rest in the Select category.

Since then, a focus on expected progeny differences (EPDs) in a straight-bred Angus herd has made some great improvements. Now, 91 per cent of his calves grade Choice or higher, with 55 per cent meeting Certified Angus Beef ® (CAB®) brand requirements.

But just as important, he said, “We did that without losing any weight on those calves. We maintained pounds production throughout those changes.” Last year, Grecian said his calves fetched an average $77/head premium over commodity prices.

That’s the kind of production and marketing model cattle feeder Jerry Bohn encouraged the audience to consider, too. The general manager of Pratt (Kan.) Feeders encourages and pushes customers toward selling their calves weaned and pre-conditioned, vaccinated at the least.

“We’re looking for cattle with a story,” he said, explaining the importance of keeping detailed management records as a selling point. “With today’s feed costs, we need cattle that will finish quickly and economically. Then the key to making money on these grids is to reduce discounts.”

High-quality carcass characteristics coincide with higher profitability. Bohn shared data on 650,000 cattle in the 2010 USPB database. Of those, the groups with less than 5 per cent CAB acceptance rates made $17.26/head over market value on that company’s grid. Groups with 25 per cent to 30 per cent CAB made $39.85/head, while those with 55 per cent CAB or higher saw average premiums of $69.40/head.

To hit those targets, Bohn said cattlemen must focus on all the production factors discussed on the panel. “We must narrow the genetic pool to reduce variation in our cow herd. We’re always looking to buy better cattle.

“After all,” Bohn said, “we’re in the business to provide quality eating experience to consumers 100 per cent of the time. We’re not there yet.”

April 2011

© 2000 - 2024 - Global Ag Media. All Rights Reserved | No part of this site may be reproduced without permission.