TheCattleSite.com - news, features, articles and disease information for the cattle industry

Featured Articles

Feeding Dairy Cows for Body Condition Score

04 July 2008

Changes in body weight are not a very good indicator of the nutritional status of dairy cows, writes Alvaro Garcia and Arnold Hippen of the Dairy Science Department - South Dakota State University, Extension Extra.

For example, while the gut contents of a 1400 lb. dairy cow weigh approximately 200 lbs., the cow has a daily intake of nearly 100 lbs. of feed (fresh weight) and 160 to 240 lbs. of water (one gallon equals 8 lbs). In addition, the cow outputs over 120 lbs. of fresh manure and urine per day (NRC 2001), as well as 50 to 100-plus lbs. of milk. Thus, the ability to accurately depict actual changes in body mass via body weight measurements can be affected by daily fluctuations in body weight. A better method of evaluating the nutritional status of cows is through its body condition score (BCS).

Body condition scoring, while subjective, is a useful and practical visual assessment tool of the nutritional status of cattle. High percentages of repeatability, both between measurements and between scorers, can be obtained with practice. The scoring system usually in use for dairy cattle is a 5-point scale, with 1 corresponding to an extremely thin cow, and 5 to a cow with excessive fat deposits (Wildman et al. 1982). Photos of and a text description for each body condition score are provided at the conclusion of this publication.

High feed costs may sometimes lead to poor decisions when it comes to selecting feedstuffs for cattle at different physiological states. In general, in an attempt to maximize returns on feed dollars, high-producing dairy cows are offered the best feeds available. Similarly, to decrease overall feed costs, far-off dry cows are usually fed lowquality forages. The latter approach, especially if extremely low-quality forages are fed, negatively affects the resumption of the cow’s reproductive activity right after calving, while also increasing the incidence of healthrelated disorders. Body condition score can be used routinely both to assess the nutritional status of different cattle feeding groups and to determine the right feed allocation (where it will have the greatest effect on income over feed costs).

Body Condition and Post-Calving Ovarianactivity

For the first 4 to 6 weeks after calving, the cow’s feed intake does not increase as fast as milk production does, which results in the mobilization of body stores. Thus, during the first two months of lactation, the extent to which a cow will lose body condition is determined by the balance between her nutrient uptake and her genetic potential for milk production. According to the NRC (2001), the equilibrium between tissue mobilization and accretion in an adequately fed cow can occur at approximately 60 days post-calving. Achieving this equilibrium as soon as possible is of importance because of the related increases in the percent of cows that resume ovarian cyclic activity (table 1). A faster return to ovarian cyclic activity is critically important because it both allows producers to shorten the voluntary waiting period (calving to first insemination) and reduces the calving interval. It has been demonstrated that the BCS recorded one month after calving had the largest correlation with calving interval, particularly in first-lactation cows (Price et al. 2000). Similarly, high-producing cows with low BCS five weeks or more after calving can be expected to have delayed estrus resumption. Cows with poor BCS had fewer normal oocytes than cows with higher scores, whereas follicle numbers were higher in cows with BCS of 3 to 5 (Dominguez 1995).

Table 1. Cow body condition at calving on the cumulative percentage return to estrus
 
Cumulative percentage return to estrus
 
Days after calving
  40 50 60 70 80
Thin 19 34 46 55 62
Moderate 21 45 61 79 88
Good 31 42 91 96 98
Source: Wiltbank (1977).

Body Condition and Cow Health

An adequate body condition is very important for the maintenance of an animal’s production, reproduction, and overall health. If improving body condition score to the optimum increases fertility, excessive condition can result in metabolic problems, particularly in close-up cows. Fatty liver can occur shortly before and after calving, during what has been termed “transition period.” When faced with a reduction in intake, a cow mobilizes body fat, which increases both the concentration of circulating fatty acids and the fat deposits in the liver. Dry cows with body condition of 3 or less can be fed more energy in the diet to improve their condition with less risk of fatty liver. The risk is less because the liver does not deposit fat while in positive energy balance. On the other hand, the efficiency of depositing energy is greater while in lactation, so it is more important both to achieve a desired body condition before dry-off and to maintain the body condition from then through calving.

Over-conditioned cows should not be “feed restricted,” as fat would be mobilized from adipose tissue—which will increase circulating fatty acids and, in turn, increase fat deposits in the liver. As many as 50% of the cows in many dairy herds have fatty liver (Gerloff et al. 1986). Fatty liver both negatively affects the outcome of other metabolic diseases (in particular, displaced abomasum and ketosis) and increases the cost of production. Kelton et al. (1998) suggested that clinical ketosis costs U.S. dairy farmers $62,640,000 yearly (4 to 8% incidence per herd, and $145 per case). Fatty liver is also associated with increased incidences and severity of laminitis, mastitis, milk fever, retained placenta, and metritis. In the long term, increased liver fat concentrations are associated with decreased reproductive success and decreased milk production in dairy cows.

Feeding for Body Condition Score

With high feed prices, a logical approach is to take a closer look at the efficiency of feed utilization (with the implication being that less feed may be used by an animal to produce the same amount of product). One problem is that improvements in feed efficiency early in lactation are heavily biased towards greater body energy mobilization compared to the feed energy supply. Figure 1 shows the evolution of suggested BCS and feed efficiency for milk production during an entire lactation.

Early in lactation, feed efficiency for milk production is artificially high (2.4) and results from a low initial feed intake paired with body fat mobilization. As a result, once feed intake starts to increase, in the first two months of lactation, the feed efficiency for milk production sharply decreases (hand-in-hand with increased feed intake); and feed efficiency continues to decrease through the remainder of the lactation. After the 8 week of lactation, the energy supplied by the feed tends to match that required for milk production. At this time, the cow starts to gain condition, whereas feed efficiency for milk production continues to drop steadily; this is represented by the two divergent lines in fig. 1.

Improving feed efficiency without taking a close look at body condition can thus negatively impact fertility, productivity, and overall animal health. In addition, feeding for body condition is very important to reduce the incidence of health problems. It has been suggested that a 1% increase in the variation of dry matter intake increases the likelihood of post-calving incidents by 4% (McGuffey et al. 1997).

Cows should end their lactation in the body condition that would be desirable at calving (e.g., 3.5) to avoid the need to add weight during the dry-off period. Body condition in excess of 3.5 to 3.75 during the dry period can lead to increased incidences of fat cow syndrome and fatty livers at calving, compared with condition gained during lactation. On the other hand, underfeeding dry cows, either to make them lose excessive weight and/or as a result of feeding low quality forages or feed restriction, can lead to body fat mobilization and increase incidence of ketosis.

It is important to take into consideration cattle socialization as it relates to BCS. When first- and later-lactation animals are grouped together, they usually compete for available space. If BCS is to be maintained during the dry period, it is very important to ensure that there is enough feed bunk, water, and stall space for each cow. Feedstuffs used in the formulation of far dry-off cows are usually of lower digestibility/energy content. Differentiation has to be made between low quality that is due to less total

Body Condition Scores of Dairy Cows
Body condition score 1. Deep cavity around tailhead. Bones of pelvis and short ribs sharp and easily felt. No fatty tissue in pelvic or loin area. Deep depression in loin.
(Image: Craig Johnson, Elanco Products Co.)
Body condition score 2. Shallow cavity around tailhead with some fatty tissue lining it and covering pin bones. Pelvis easily felt. Ends of short ribs feel rounded and upper surfaces can be felt with slight pressure. Depression visible in loin area.
(Image: Craig Johnson, Elanco Products Co.)
Body condition score 3. No cavity around tailhead and fatty tissue easily felt over whole area. Pelvis can be felt with slight pressure. Thick layer of tissue covering top of short ribs which can still be felt with pressure. Slight depression in loin area.
(Image: Craig Johnson, Elanco Products Co.)
Body condition score 4. Folds of fatty tissue are seen around tailhead with patches of fat covering pin bones. Pelvis can be felt with firm pressure. Short ribs can no longer be felt. No depression in loin area.
(Image: Craig Johnson, Elanco Products Co.)
Body condition score 5. Tailhead is buried in thick layer of fatty tissue. Pelvic bones cannot be felt even with firm pressure. Short ribs covered with thick layer of fatty tissue.
(Image: Craig Johnson, Elanco Products Co.)

digestible nutrients and low quality that is due to the presence of contaminants such as weeds and/or fungi growth. Feeds that are unacceptable for lactating dairy cows should also be questionable for dry animals. “Off-smells” due to contaminants oftentimes result in feed refusal, sorting, and/or uneven ration intake, all of which can affect BCS. Animals that have maintained adequate condition through the dry period can then, possibly, lose condition as a result of selective feeding.

Diets fed to dry cows should be balanced and palatable and formulated for a transition between the far-off dry period and early lactation. Moderately increase grain in the diet right before calving to increase the energy density of the ration, and reduce body condition losses right after calving. Even when all these measures are considered, energy demands early in lactation will lead to some body stores losses, particularly in the form of fat. One important measure is to manage rations for consistency of feed intake early in the lactation.

References

Dominguez, M. M. 1995. Effects of body condition, reproductive status and breed on follicular population and oocyte quality in cows. Theriogenology. 43:1405-1418.
Elanco Animal Health, 1997. Body Condition Scoring in Dairy Cattle. Indianapolis, IN.
Gerloff, B.J., T.H. Herdt, and R.S. Emery. 1986. Relationship of hepatic lipidosis to health and performance in dairy cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 188:845-50.
Kelton, D.F., K.D. Lissemore, and R.E. Martin. 1998. Recommendations for recording and calculating the incidence of selected clinical diseases of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2502-2509.
McGuffey, R. , J. Symanowskil, J. Kubel, J. Shirleyz, R. Wallace, and J. Clark. 1997. Variation in feed intake as a predictor for the subsequent occurrence of health conditions in the postpartum transition cow. Journal of Dairy Science Vol 80, Suppl. 1.
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci. Washington, DC.
Price, J. E., M. P. Coffey, and S. Brotherstone. 2000. The genetic relationship between calving interval, body condition score and linear type and management traits in registered Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2664-2671.
Wildman, E. E., G. M. Jones, P. E. Wagner, R. L. Boman, H. F. Troutt,Jr., and T. N. Lesch. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 65:495–501.
Wiltbank J N. 1977. Effect of level of nutrition on growth and reproduction of beef females. Georgia Nutrition Conference, 16-18 February 1977. pp. 138-146.


June 2008

Partners


Seasonal Picks