NFU Will Not Support Legislative Changes to COOL

US - National Farmers Union (NFU) has urged US Trade Representative (USTR) Ron Kirk to pursue a robust appeals process on the recent decision of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) that ruled against the United States’ implementation of the country-of-origin-labeling (COOL) law.
calendar icon 30 January 2012
clock icon 1 minute read

NFU President Roger Johnson issued a statement last week, following the appeal. He said: "NFU has a proud record of supporting COOL. We were instrumental in getting the COOL laws passed in 2002 and again in 2008.

"We will oppose any attempt to change that law. Fortunately, the WTO decision against US country-of-origin-labeling did not find fault with our law. It simply found fault with the rules and regulations which were used to implement the law.

"As the office of the USTR contemplates its approach to the WTO decision, we urge them to mount a robust and vigorous defense of COOL.

"We are aware that behind the scenes attempts at negotiating a settlement to the WTO decision have some stakeholders arguing that we must weaken our law. We strongly disagree and urge a fervent defense.

"Consumers have a right to know where their meat comes from – and they overwhelmingly want to know just that."

The labeling law was passed as a part of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and amended in 2008. COOL requires retailers to notify their customers of the source of certain foods. Canada and Mexico filed a complaint against the United States’ law, which led to the recent ruling. The deadline for filing an appeal to the WTO decision is 23 March 2012.

TheCattleSite News Desk

© 2000 - 2024 - Global Ag Media. All Rights Reserved | No part of this site may be reproduced without permission.